Jack Smith, the former Justice Department special counsel, is slated for a closed‑door interview with House Republicans on Wednesday. The meeting follows lawmakers’ rejection of his offer to testify publicly about investigations into former President Donald Trump. Smith’s appearance will focus on the two criminal inquiries he has overseen during the Biden administration. The House Judiciary Committee, led by Republicans, is probing the Justice Department’s actions against Trump.
The deposition is part of the committee’s broader investigation into the DOJ’s criminal inquiries of Trump. It examines how the department pursued charges related to the 2020 election and the alleged mishandling of classified documents. The committee has subpoenaed Smith to provide testimony and documents earlier this month. His cooperation is required under congressional subpoena.
Smith was subpoenaed earlier in the month to give testimony and submit documents. He had previously offered to answer questions publicly before the committee more than a month ago. The committee rejected that offer, preferring a closed‑door deposition instead. Smith’s lawyers have stated that he will comply with the congressional demand.
In a statement this month, one of Smith’s lawyers, Peter Koski, said, \”We are disappointed that offer was rejected, and that the American people will be denied the opportunity to hear directly from Jack on these topics.\” He added that \”Jack looks forward to meeting with the committee later this month to discuss his work and clarify the various misconceptions about his investigation.\” Trump told reporters at the White House that he supported an open hearing, saying, \”I’d rather see him testify publicly. There’s no way he can answer the questions.\”
Smith is expected to discuss both investigations of Trump but will not answer questions that call for grand jury materials, which are restricted by law. According to an anonymous source familiar with the investigation, Smith will also correct what he sees as mischaracterizations from Republicans about his work. The source mentioned the team’s use of cellphone records belonging to certain GOP lawmakers. The records were reviewed as part of the investigation.
The phone records reviewed by prosecutors included details only about the incoming and outgoing phone numbers and the length of the call but not the contents of the conversation. Republicans seized on the fact that the team had analyzed records from on and around January 6, 2021, when pro‑Trump rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol. The committee is interested in how those records were used in the investigations. Smith’s team has stated that the records were part of a broader review.
Smith was appointed in 2022 to oversee the Justice Department investigations into Trump’s efforts to overturn his 2020 presidential election loss. He was also tasked with overseeing the investigation into Trump’s hoarding of classified documents at his Mar‑a‑Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. Smith’s team filed charges in both investigations. The charges were filed before Trump was reelected in 2024.
After Trump was elected to the White House again last year, Smith abandoned the cases, citing Justice Department legal opinions that say a sitting president cannot be indicted. The legal opinions guided the decision to halt the investigations. Smith’s team argued that the opinions made it legally untenable to proceed. The abandonment has drawn criticism from some Republican lawmakers.
Republicans who control Congress have sought interviews with at least some individual members of Smith’s team. They are interested in understanding the evidence that led to the charges. The committee has also requested access to documents related to the investigations. The requests reflect the committee’s broader effort to scrutinize the DOJ’s actions.
In recent weeks, Republicans have highlighted revelations that the team, as part of its investigation, had analyzed the phone records of select GOP lawmakers from on and around January 6, 2021. The phone records reviewed by prosecutors included details only about the incoming and outgoing phone numbers and the length of the call. The records did not contain the content of the conversations. The committee is examining the use of these records.
Legal opinions from the Justice Department stated that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Smith cited those opinions when deciding to abandon the cases. The opinions are based on the interpretation of the Constitution and DOJ policy. The decision to halt the investigations was made in 2024.
The committee’s focus on grand jury restrictions reflects concerns about the legality of accessing certain evidence. Smith will not answer questions that require grand jury materials. The restriction is grounded in federal law. The committee is seeking to understand how the DOJ navigated those restrictions.
Smith’s lawyers have emphasized his willingness to cooperate with the congressional demand. They noted that he had previously volunteered to testify publicly. The lawyers expressed disappointment that the offer was rejected. They highlighted that Smith looks forward to meeting with the committee.
The closed‑door interview is part of the committee’s strategy to obtain detailed information without a public hearing. It allows the committee to ask questions directly to Smith. The interview will take place on Wednesday. The committee hopes to clarify misconceptions about the investigations.
The significance of the deposition for ongoing investigations is that it may reveal new insights into the DOJ’s approach. It may also address questions about the use of cellphone records. The committee is interested in how the records were analyzed. The interview could provide context for the legal opinions cited.
The political environment surrounding the interview is charged. Republicans control Congress and have been critical of the DOJ’s investigations. Democrats support transparency and oversight. The interview is expected to be a focal point for both sides.
The DOJ’s role in investigations of former President Trump is central to the discussion. Smith oversaw the investigations that led to charges. The DOJ’s policies guided the decision to abandon the cases. The committee is scrutinizing the DOJ’s actions.
The timeline of Smith’s appointment and case developments spans from 2022 to 2024. He was appointed to oversee the investigations in 2022. Charges were filed before Trump’s reelection. The cases were abandoned in 2024. The committee is reviewing the timeline.
The interplay between legal opinions and political decisions is evident. Legal opinions guided the DOJ’s decision to halt the investigations. Political pressure has influenced the committee’s requests. The interview will explore this dynamic.
Key takeaways: Smith will meet House Republicans after lawmakers rejected his public testimony offer. The session covers his work on election‑overturn and cases. Republicans are scrutinizing the use of cellphone records in the investigations.
In closing, the upcoming interview will be a critical moment for the House Judiciary Committee’s inquiry into the Justice Department’s investigations of former President Trump. The session will provide a platform for Smith to clarify the DOJ’s actions and address misconceptions. The outcome may influence the committee’s next steps.
The committee’s request for a closed‑door deposition aligns with its broader oversight mandate. It seeks to ensure that the DOJ’s investigative processes are transparent to elected officials. The committee has previously requested documents related to the investigations. Smith’s cooperation is essential for the committee’s work.
The debate over grand jury access highlights the balance between legal confidentiality and congressional oversight. Smith’s refusal to answer questions about grand jury materials is consistent with federal law. The committee will need to find alternative ways to assess the evidence. This issue remains a point of contention.
The interview may also touch on the broader implications for presidential accountability. Smith’s role in the investigations positions him at the center of discussions about the limits of presidential power. The committee’s questions may probe how the DOJ navigated constitutional constraints. The conversation could shed light on future investigations.
Overall, the closed‑door meeting underscores the ongoing tension between the Justice Department and Congress over the handling of former President Trump’s investigations. It reflects the committee’s determination to scrutinize the DOJ’s actions and seek clarity. The interview will be closely watched by both sides of the political spectrum.
Hi, I’m Cameron R. Hayes, the journalist, editor, and creator behind NewsOfFortWorth.com. I built this platform with a simple purpose — to deliver fast, clear, and trustworthy news that keeps Fort Worth informed and connected.
I’ve spent more than five years working in digital media, reporting on breaking news, local government, public safety, business growth, community events, and the real stories that shape life in Fort Worth. My goal has always been the same: to provide accurate, community-focused reporting that people can rely on every day.
